Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hannah Clark, Respondent, v. George H. Bradley, as Executor, etc., Appellant, 1893 — 139 N.Y. 653 · caselaw · US
General
Hannah Clark, Respondent, v. George H. Bradley, as Executor, etc., Appellant
139 N.Y. 653·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hannah Clark, Respondent, v. George H. Bradley, as Executor, etc., Appellant.
(Argued October 13, 1893;
decided October 27, 1893.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made October 4, 1892, which reversed an order of Special Term setting aside a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee and granting a new trial and which affirmed said judgment.
Leon M. Sherwood for appellant.
John H. White for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.