Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
WOODWARD & LOTHROP, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Willie E. LINEBERRY, Appellee, 1931 — 50 F.2d 317 · caselaw · US
Corporations
WOODWARD & LOTHROP, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Willie E. LINEBERRY, Appellee
50 F.2d 317·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WOODWARD & LOTHROP, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Willie E. LINEBERRY, Appellee.
No. 5064.
Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Argued March 9, 1931.
Decided May 4, 1931.
G. Bowdoin Craighill, Chas. B. Tebbs, and Frank H. Myers, all of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Richard L. Merrick, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB, HITZ, and GRONER, Associate Justices.
[MAJORITY — GRONER, Associate Justice.]
GRONER, Associate Justice.
For reasons stated at length in No. 5063, 60 App. D. C. 164, 50 F. (2d) 314, the judgment in this case must be and is reversed.
Reversed.