Corporations
E. PERRY CHURCHILL, Respondent, v. TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant
24 Cal. App. 2d 745·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1938·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Civ. No. 2126.
Fourth Appellate District.
January 17, 1938.]
E. PERRY CHURCHILL, Respondent, v. TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant.
P. Talbot Hannigan and Francis P. Harrington for Appellant.
Musiek & Burrell, Clayton Straub and James E. Bednai for Respondent.
[MAJORITY — BARNARD, P. J.]
BARNARD, P. J.
The material facts involved in this appeal are exactly similar in all respects to those involved in Churchill v. Title Insurance & Trust Co., 4 Civil No. 2122, this day decided (ante, p. 415 [75 Pac. (2d) 526]). The same question of law is presented and for the reasons given in the case referred to and on the authority thereof the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed.
Marks, J., concurred.
A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on March 17, 1938.