Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Catto et al., 1966 — 382 U.S. 968 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. Catto et al.
382 U.S. 968·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 535.
United States v. Catto et al.
Ben F. Foster for Catto et al., and Claiborne B. Gregory for Wardlaw et al., respondents, on the motions.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. (Certiorari granted, ante, p. 925.) Motions of respondents to remove case from summary calendar granted and a total of one and one-half hours is allotted for oral argument.