General
Diana R. Smith, Respondent, v. Louise M. Keller, Personally and as Executrix, etc., of Ellen Raidy, Deceased, and Others, Appellants
145 A.D. 908·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1911·NY
All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the verdict is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence, and because of errors in the admission and rejection of evidence.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Diana R. Smith, Respondent, v. Louise M. Keller, Personally and as Executrix, etc., of Ellen Raidy, Deceased, and Others, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the verdict is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence, and because of errors in the admission and rejection of evidence.