Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Huldah H. Clapp v. Robert C. Clapp et al. In the Matter of the Receivership of Thomas B. Rand, 1890 — 125 N.Y. 693 · caselaw · US
General
Huldah H. Clapp v. Robert C. Clapp et al. In the Matter of the Receivership of Thomas B. Rand
125 N.Y. 693·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Huldah H. Clapp v. Robert C. Clapp et al. In the Matter of the Receivership of Thomas B. Rand.
(Argued December 1, 1890;
decided December 16, 1890.)
Cross-appeals from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made December 7, 1889, which affirmed in part and reversed in part an order of Special Term entered upon the report of a referee adjusting the accounts of Thomas B. Rand as temporary receiver.
Wheeler E. Peckham for appellant.
George G. Edit for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion of General Term.
All concur.
Order affirmed.