General
Box Elder Power & Light Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Brigham City
220 U.S. 603·Supreme Court of the United States·1911
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 94.
Box Elder Power & Light Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Brigham City.
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Utah.
Argued for the plaintiff in error and submitted for the défendant in error March 10, 1911.
Decided March 13, 1911.
Mr. William H. King, Mr. Henry P. Henderson and Mr. Edward B. Critchlow for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam,.]
Per Curiam,.
Dismissed
for want of jurisdiction. Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. McGrew, 188 U. S. 291, 308; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 100; Kaufman v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610. Mr. Charles C. Dey, Mr. Hiram E. Booth and Mr. E. A. Walton for the plaintiff in error.