Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bank of Iron Gate, Plaintiff in Error, v. Maggie A. Brady, Executrix, etc., 1902 — 187 U.S. 635 · caselaw · US
General
Bank of Iron Gate, Plaintiff in Error, v. Maggie A. Brady, Executrix, etc.
187 U.S. 635·Supreme Court of the United States·1902
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 349.
Bank of Iron Gate, Plaintiff in Error, v. Maggie A. Brady, Executrix, etc.
In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Yirginia.
Submitted October 14, 1902.
Decided October 20, 1902.
Mr. William L. Royall for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Solicitor General Richards for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs, on the authority of Veazie Bank v. Fenno, 8 Wall. 533.