Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William M. Jones, Respondent, v. John Schreyer, impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1872 — 49 N.Y. 674 · caselaw · US
Securities
William M. Jones, Respondent, v. John Schreyer, impleaded, etc., Appellant
49 N.Y. 674·New York Court of Appeals·1872·NY
'All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William M. Jones, Respondent, v. John Schreyer, impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued May 24, 1872;
decided May 28, 1872.)
Action against defendant as indorser of a promissory note. The note was for $1,500; was indorsed for a special purpose ; but was diverted by the payee, but pledged as collateral security for the payment of an antecedent debt. JSefd, that plaintiff was not a Iona fide holder, and if he were could only collect the amount due him.
Rufus B. Oowvng for appellant.
William Henry Arnoux for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Peckham, J.,]
Peckham, J.,
reads for reversal and new trial.
'All concur.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide event.