General
SHERYL SHEEHAN v. ALAN BALASIC
245 Conn. 148·Connecticut Supreme Court·1998·CT
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SHERYL SHEEHAN v. ALAN BALASIC
(SC 15818)
Berdon, Norcott, Katz, Palmer and McDonald, Js.
Argued April 21
officially released June 23, 1998
James K. Filan, Jr., with whom, on the biief, was Stuart Bear, for the appellant (defendant).
David Battat, for the appellee (plaintiff).
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.
The appeal is dismissed.
We granted the defendant’s petition for certification limited to the following issue: “Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the twenty-four month term of the unallocated alimony and support provision was not modifiable?” Sheehan v. Balasic, 243 Conn. 945, 704 A.2d 798 (1997).