Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Freida Schradsky, Plaintiff in Error, v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Lake, 1903 — 191 U.S. 561 · caselaw · US
General
Freida Schradsky, Plaintiff in Error, v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Lake
191 U.S. 561·Supreme Court of the United States·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 3.
Freida Schradsky, Plaintiff in Error, v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Lake.
[MAJORITY]
In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. • Dismissecl with costs, on authority of counsel for plaintiff in error.
October 13, 1903.
Mr. H. B. Johnson for plaintiff in error.
Mr. C. S. Thomas, Mr. W. H.. Bryant and Mr. H. H. Lee for defendant in error.