Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank, Respondent, v. Thomas J. Clute, Impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1886 — 102 N.Y. 694 · caselaw · US
General
The Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank, Respondent, v. Thomas J. Clute, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
102 N.Y. 694·New York Court of Appeals·1886·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank, Respondent, v. Thomas J. Clute, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Submitted April 19, 1886 ;
decided June 1, 1886.)
T. J. Glute, appellant in person.
B. Skaats for -respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.