Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
STRONG v. GASSERT, 1909 — 215 U.S. 583 · caselaw · US
General
STRONG v. GASSERT
215 U.S. 583·Supreme Court of the United States·1909
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
STRONG v. GASSERT.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MONTANA.
No. 401.
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted November 1, 1909.
Decided November 8, 1909.
A writ of error to the highest court of a State dismissed for want of jurisdiction on the authority of previous decisions.
Writ of error to review 38 Montana, 18, dismissed.
Mr. M. S. Gunn for plaintiff in error.
Mr. W. C. Keegin for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U. S. 432; Corkran Oil & Development Co. v. Arnaudet, 199 U. S. 182; Arkansas Southern Railroad Co. v. German National Bank, 207 U. S. 270.