Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles A. Hausauer et al., Respondents, v. Sarah Dahlman et al., Appellants, 1900 — 163 N.Y. 567 · caselaw · US
General
Charles A. Hausauer et al., Respondents, v. Sarah Dahlman et al., Appellants
163 N.Y. 567·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles A. Hausauer et al., Respondents, v. Sarah Dahlman et al., Appellants.
Hausauer v. Hahlman, 18 App. Div. 475, affirmed.
(Argued May 1, 1900;
decided May 15, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered September 11, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court at an Equity Term.
Simon Fleischmann for appellants.
Adelbert Moot for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
•Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin,Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.