Criminal Law · MBE-tested
AUTRY v. UNITED STATES
73 F. 159·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1896
Before PARDEE and MeCORMIGK, Circuit Judge's, and BRUCE, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
AUTRY v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
February 24, 1896.)
No. 314.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Alabama.
This was a criminal information against James Autry, charging him with unlawfully cutting and removing timber from the public lands. He was convicted and sentenced in the district court, and has sued out a writ of error from this court.
31. D. tVickersham, W. M. Mackintosh, aud J. C. Rich, for plaintiff in error.
James N. Miller, U. S. Atty.
Before PARDEE and MeCORMIGK, Circuit Judge's, and BRUCE, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PARDEE, Circuit Judge.]
PARDEE, Circuit Judge.
The material questions in this case are similar to those presented in the case of Shijer v. II. S. (just decided) 73 Fed. 158, and the ruling must he the same way. .judgment affirmed. ¡