Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Lelia Isadora HOWELL, Administratrix of the Estate of Charlie Herman Howell, and Lelia Isadora Howell, Individually, Appellee, 1934 — 73 F.2d 1016 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Lelia Isadora HOWELL, Administratrix of the Estate of Charlie Herman Howell, and Lelia Isadora Howell, Individually, Appellee
73 F.2d 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Lelia Isadora HOWELL, Administratrix of the Estate of Charlie Herman Howell, and Lelia Isadora Howell, Individually, Appellee.
No. 3643.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
May 22, 1934.
J. R. McCrary, U. S. Atty., and Thos. C. Carter, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Greensboro, N. C.
R. IT. McNeill, of Washington, D. 0., and J. F. Jordan, of Wilkesboro, N. C., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Case dismissed under Rule 20 in accordance with agreement of counsel.