Contracts · MBE-tested
ELLIOTT v. OREGON
387 U.S. 571·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ELLIOTT v. OREGON.
No. 1144,
Misc.
Decided June 5, 1967.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Oregon for further consideration in light of Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738.
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.