Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joe DRAZICH, Appellant, v. Finch R. ARCHER, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary at McNeil Island, Washington, Appellee, 1932 — 60 F.2d 1084 · caselaw · US
General
Joe DRAZICH, Appellant, v. Finch R. ARCHER, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary at McNeil Island, Washington, Appellee
60 F.2d 1084·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joe DRAZICH, Appellant, v. Finch R. ARCHER, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary at McNeil Island, Washington, Appellee.
No. 6907.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 13, 1932.
Joe Drazieh, in pro. per.
Anthony Savage, U. S. Atty., of Seattle, Wash., and Joseph A. Mallery, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Tacoma, Wash, for appellee.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon motion of counsel for appellee, and of appellant’s response thereto, it is ordered that the appeal in this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed for failure of appellant to file record and docket cause, without prejudice to appellant making application for writ of habeas corpus to the District Court of the United States for the District within which he is confined.