Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James Talcott, Respondent, v. Morris Levy et al., Appellants, 1894 — 143 N.Y. 636 · caselaw · US
General
James Talcott, Respondent, v. Morris Levy et al., Appellants
143 N.Y. 636·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James Talcott, Respondent, v. Morris Levy et al., Appellants.
(Argued June 11, 1894;
decided June 22, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior ■Court of the city of Rew York, entered upon an order made April Y, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff •entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Ira Leo Bamberger for appellants.
Arthur O. Bounds for respondent.
Mem. of decision, 3 Misc. Rep. 615.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.