Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Julian CAZENAVE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee; Andrew BATTISTELLA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee; William STRUVE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee; Henry WALTERS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee; John BENINO, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee; Victor ADAMS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee, 1925 — 3 F.2d 724 · caselaw · US
General
Julian CAZENAVE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee; Andrew BATTISTELLA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee; William STRUVE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee; Henry WALTERS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee; John BENINO, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee; Victor ADAMS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee
3 F.2d 724·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Julian CAZENAVE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. Andrew BATTISTELLA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. William STRUVE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. Henry WALTERS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. John BENINO, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. Victor ADAMS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
January 13, 1925.)
(Nos. 4418-4422, 4431.)
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Rufus E. Foster, Judge.
Hugh M. Wilkinson, of New Orleans, La. (Hugh Suthon, of New Orleans, La., on the brief), for appellant, No. 4418.
Hugh M. Wilkinson, of New Orleans, La. (Maurice Rooney, of New Orleans, La., on the brief), for appellant, No. 4419.
Hugh M. Wilkinson, of New Orleans, La., for appellant, No. 4420.
Hugh M. Wilkinson, of New Orleans La. (Maurice Rooney, of New Orleans, La., on the brief), for appellant, No. 4421.
Alfred J. Bonomo, of New Orleans, La., for appellant, No. 4422.
Walter L. Gleason, of New Orleans, La., for appellant, No. 4431.
Louis H. Burns, U. S. Atty., Edwin H. Grace, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of New Orleans, La.
Before WALKER and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and CLAYTON, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — BRYAN, Circuit Judge.]
BRYAN, Circuit Judge.
The same questions arise in these eases as in the case of Denapolis v. United States (No. 4313) 3 F.(2d) 722, this day decided and aflirmed.
The decrees appealed from are therefore affirmed.