General
In re Magisterial District Judge Mark A. BRUNO, Magisterial District 15-1-01. Petition of Mark A. Bruno
99 A.3d 526·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·2014·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re Magisterial District Judge Mark A. BRUNO, Magisterial District 15-1-01. Petition of Mark A. Bruno.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued Sept. 10, 2013.
Decided Aug. 28, 2014.
Robert A. Graci, Esq., Judicial Conduct Board of Pennsylvania, for Judicial Conduct Board.
Samuel C. Stretton, Esq., Law Office of Samuel C. Stretton, West Chester, for Mark A. Bruno.
David J. Barton, Esq., Bentz Law Firm, P.C., Dennis R. Joyce, Esq., Pittsburgh, for Special Court Judges Association of PA.
A. Taylor Williams, Esq., Philadelphia, Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts, for AOPC.
Michael A. Bloom, Esq., Morgan Lewis & Bockius, L.L.P., Philadelphia, Robert L. Byer, Esq., Duane Morris LLP, Pittsburgh, Forest Neil Myers, Esq., Forest N. Myers Law Offices, Shippensburg, Thomas G. Wilkinson Jr., Esq., Cozen O’Connor, Philadelphia, for Pennsylvania Bar Association.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 28th day of August 2014, the Order of the Supreme Court dated February 1, 2013, is hereby VACATED.
Opinion to follow.