Bankruptcy
In re PALEAIS
287 F. 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1923
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re PALEAIS.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
February 9, 1923.)
No. 152.
Petition to Revise Order of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. In the matter of Adolph Paleais, bankrupt. A motion by the bankrupt to expunge and suppress certain testimony was denied, and an order made for the entry nunc pro tunc of an order appointing a special commissioner, and the bankrupt brings a petition to revise.
Petition dismissed.
J. G. M. Browne and Barnett E. Kopelman, both of New York City, for petitioner. David B. Tolins and Max Silverstein, both of New York City, for respondent.
Before HOUGH, MANTON, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Petition dismissed in open court.