Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Oriental Bank, Respondent, v. Saverio Gallo, Appellant, 1907 — 188 N.Y. 610 · caselaw · US
General
The Oriental Bank, Respondent, v. Saverio Gallo, Appellant
188 N.Y. 610·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Oriental Bank, Respondent, v. Saverio Gallo, Appellant.
(Submitted April 19, 1907;
decided May 7, 1907.)
Oriental Bank v. Gallo, 112 App. Div. 360, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered Hay 18, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover the amount of a certified check deposited by the defendant with the plaintiff bank upon the ground that the indorsement prior to defendant’s was a forgery.
J. Stewart Boss and Effingham L. Holywell for appellant.
He Witt Bailey for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J.; Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ.