General
Florence A. Smith, Appellant, v. The City of Rochester, Respondent
150 N.Y. 581·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Florence A. Smith, Appellant, v. The City of Rochester, Respondent.
(Argued October 14, 1896;
decided October 30, 1896.)
Smith v. City of Boclwster, 79 Hun, 174, affirmed.
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered July 25, 1894, which affirmed, on exceptions ordered to he heard in the first instance at General Term, an order of the court on trial at Circuit granting a nonsuit, and directed judgment in favor of defendant.
Walter S. Mubbell for appellant.
A. J. Rodenbeek for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except IIaight, J., not sitting.