Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Morris Steinhardt, Appellant, v. John O. Baker, Respondent, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 610 · caselaw · US
General
Morris Steinhardt, Appellant, v. John O. Baker, Respondent
162 N.Y. 610·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Morris Steinhardt, Appellant, v. John O. Baker, Respondent.
(Submitted March 5, 1900;
decided March 13, 1900.)
Motion to substitute Dauphine Steinhardt, Dudley S. Harde and Edna R. Steinhardt, as executors of Morris Steinhardt, deceased, as appellants herein.
Charles E. Miller for motion.
No one opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for substitution granted, without costs.