Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People ex rel. Lucy Allen, Respondent, v. William H. Allen, Appellant, 1887 — 105 N.Y. 628 · caselaw · US
General
The People ex rel. Lucy Allen, Respondent, v. William H. Allen, Appellant
105 N.Y. 628·New York Court of Appeals·1887·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People ex rel. Lucy Allen, Respondent, v. William H. Allen, Appellant.
(Argued March 15, 1887;
decided March 25, 1887.)
This was an appeal from an order of General Term, affirming an order of Special Term in habeas corpus proceedings, awarding to the relator the custody of her three infant children. The relator and defendant were formerly man and wife, and lived in Illinois. The relator commenced an action for divorce in that State; while it was pending, defendant came to this State bringing with him their children; the action resulted in a decree granting an absolute divorce, and awarding to the relator the care and custody of the children.
The following is the mem. of the opinion :
“We dismiss this appeal for the reason that the courts below, upon a view of all the existing facts relating to the welfare and interests of the infants, exercised their discretion in awarding to the mother the custody of the children; and, in so doing, gave to the Illinois decree not the force of an estoppel, or the conclusive effect sometimes due to a judgment, but simply regarded it as a fact or circumstance bearing upon the discretion to be exercised without dictating or controlling it.
“ Appeal dismissed, with costs.”
Theodore Bacon for appellant.
John M. Davy for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam mem.]
Per Curiam mem.
for dismissal of appeal.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.