Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Georgiana Bishop, Appellant, 1893 — 139 N.Y. 624 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Georgiana Bishop, Appellant
139 N.Y. 624·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Georgiana Bishop, Appellant.
(Submitted October 3, 1893;
decided October 17, 1893.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made February 13, 1893, which affirmed a judgment of tlie Court of Sessions of Dutchess county entered upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of arson in the third degree.
Frank H. Cassidy for appellant.
H. D. Hufcut, District Attorney, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm ; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.