Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Claim of William W. Bissell, Appellant, v. The Village of Larchmont, Respondent, for Damages from Change of Grade of Addison Avenue, 1903 — 173 N.Y. 595 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Claim of William W. Bissell, Appellant, v. The Village of Larchmont, Respondent, for Damages from Change of Grade of Addison Avenue
173 N.Y. 595·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of William W. Bissell, Appellant, v. The Village of Larchmont, Respondent, for Damages from Change of Grade of Addison Avenue.
Matter of Bissell, 57 App. Div. 61, appeal dismissed.
(Argued December 16, 1902;
decided January 6, 1903.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 26, 1901, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
J. Addison Young for appellant.
Alfred Opdyke and Carsten Wendt for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett and Haight, JJ. Absent: Cullen and Werner, JJ.