General
Mary Lord, Suing for Herself as a Stockholder and a Voting Trust Certificate Holder, and All Other Stockholders and Voting Trust Certificate Holders of the Susquehanna Silk Mills, in Like Situation, Who Shall Choose to Make Themselves Party to This Action, Respondent, v. Susquehanna Silk Mills and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with William M. Vermilye and Others, Appellants
260 A.D. 1015·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1940·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary Lord, Suing for Herself as a Stockholder and a Voting Trust Certificate Holder, and All Other Stockholders and Voting Trust Certificate Holders of the Susquehanna Silk Mills, in Like Situation, Who Shall Choose to Make Themselves Party to This Action, Respondent, v. Susquehanna Silk Mills and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with William M. Vermilye and Others, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. (See Kissel v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois R. R. Co., 126 App. Div. 852; Western R. R. Co. v. Nolan, 48 N. Y. 513; Restatement of the Law of Trusts, § 282.) Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.