Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Louisiana et al., 1980 — 446 U.S. 906 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. Louisiana et al.
446 U.S. 906·Supreme Court of the United States·1980
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 9,
Orig.
United States v. Louisiana et al.
[For earlier order herein, see, e. g., 445 U. S. 923.]
[MAJORITY]
Motion of. the Special Master, Walter P. Armstrong, Jr., for allowance of additional compensation and reimbursement of expenses, as set forth in the motion, granted, and it is ordered that such costs be borne equally by the United States and Louisiana. The Court defers action at this time on the Special Master’s suggestion for discharge with respect to the reference of October 20, 1975 [423 U. S. 909].
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.