Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
REEVES v. ALABAMA, 1958 — 355 U.S. 368 · caselaw · US
General
REEVES v. ALABAMA
355 U.S. 3682 L. Ed. 2d 352·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
REEVES v. ALABAMA.
No. 66.
Argued January 8-9, 1958.
Decided January 13, 1958.
Peter A. Hall and Orzell Billingsley, Jr. argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
William F. Thetford and Robert B. Stewart argued the cause for respondent. With them on the brief were John Patterson, Attorney General of Alabama, and Bernard F. Sykes, Assistant Attorney General.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.