Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Leslie T. IGLEHEART; SAME v. John L. IGLEHEART, 1935 — 74 F.2d 1010 · caselaw · US
Tax
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Leslie T. IGLEHEART; SAME v. John L. IGLEHEART
74 F.2d 1010·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1935
Before ALSCHULER, SPARKS, and FITZHENRY, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Leslie T. IGLEHEART. SAME v. John L. IGLEHEART.
Nos. 5061, 5062.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Jan. 2, 1935.
Sewall Key, of Washington, D. C., and Francis H. Horan, of New York City, for petitioner.
John E. McClure, of Washington, D. C. (Maude Ellen White and Miller & Chevalier, all of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for respondents.
Before ALSCHULER, SPARKS, and FITZHENRY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On th$ authority of the decision of the Supreme Court in Helvering, Commissioner, v. Susan Dwight Bliss, 55 S. Ct. 17, 79 L. Ed.-, handed down November 5, 1934, the decision herein of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.