Criminal Law · MBE-tested

James Edward WILLIAMS v. STATE of Arkansas

357 Ark. 367166 S.W.3d 564·Arkansas Supreme Court·2004·AR

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

James Edward WILLIAMS v. STATE of Arkansas CR 04-413 166 S.W.3d 564 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 6, 2004 Robert N. Jeffrey, for appellant. No response. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. Appellant James Edward Williams, by and riam. attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Robert N. Jeffrey, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.