Criminal Law · MBE-tested

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Howard Curry, Appellant

251 A.D.2d 594673 N.Y.S.2d 608·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1998·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Howard Curry, Appellant. [673 NYS2d 608] [MAJORITY] —Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered June 14, 1995, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci, Florio and Mc-Ginity, JJ., concur.