Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. E. G. Massingale, as Administrator, et al., 1916 — 241 U.S. 693 · caselaw · US
General
The Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. E. G. Massingale, as Administrator, et al.
241 U.S. 693·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 387.
The Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. E. G. Massingale, as Administrator, et al.
In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky.
May 22, 1916.
Mr. John Galvin and Mr. Edward Col-ston for the plaintiff in error. Mr. James N. Sharpe for the defendants in error.
[MAJORITY]
Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the plaintiff in error.