Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary Ann Adams et al., as Executors of Walter Adams, Deceased, Respondents, v. George Elwood, Appellant, 1901 — 168 N.Y. 678 · caselaw · US
General
Mary Ann Adams et al., as Executors of Walter Adams, Deceased, Respondents, v. George Elwood, Appellant
168 N.Y. 678·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary Ann Adams et al., as Executors of Walter Adams, Deceased, Respondents, v. George Elwood, Appellant.
Adams v. Elwood, 61 App. Div. 622, appeal dismissed.
(Argued November 13, 1901;
decided December 3, 1901.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made May 31, 1901, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to vacate and set aside an order of reference, the referee’s report and the judgment entered thereon.
William L. Mathot for appellant.
11. J. Shadbolt and James M. Seaman for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Yann and Landon, JJ.