General

In the Matter of the Application of Fritz Kuhn, Petitioner, Appellant, against Archibald R. Watson, County Clerk of the County of New York, Respondent

257 A.D. 680·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1939·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

In the Matter of the Application of Fritz Kuhn, Petitioner, Appellant, against Archibald R. Watson, County Clerk of the County of New York, Respondent. First Department, October 30, 1939. Peter L. F. Sabbatino, for the appellant. Frank A. Carlin, for the respondent. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. We interpret subdivision 3 of section 749-aa of the Judiciary Law to permit an inspection of the entire record of the county clerk concerning the examination of prospective special jurors, not limited to those particulars which the county clerk is required by the statute to enter in the record. The order so far as appealed from should be reversed and the motion granted in all respects. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed and the motion granted in all respects.