General
Jerome W. Conkling, Plaintiff, v. William Murphy et al., Defendants. In the Matter of the Application of Jerome W. Conkling, Appellant. Edward A. Scott, Jr., Attorney at Law, Respondent
271 A.D.2d 772·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1946·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jerome W. Conkling, Plaintiff, v. William Murphy et al., Defendants. In the Matter of the Application of Jerome W. Conkling, Appellant. Edward A. Scott, Jr., Attorney at Law, Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore, and Callahan, JJ.