Torts · MBE-tested
Steven M. Rose, Respondent, v. Metro North Commuter Railroad et al., Defendants, and Village/Town of Mt. Kisco, Appellant
120 A.D.2d 725·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1986·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Steven M. Rose, Respondent, v Metro North Commuter Railroad et al., Defendants, and Village/Town of Mt. Kisco, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Village/Town of Mt. Kisco appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Marbach, J.), entered July 2, 1985, as vacated a prior order of the same court, entered May 22, 1985 dismissing the action against it for failure to comply with General Municipal Law § 50-h (5).
Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Under the circumstances of this case, Special Term acted correctly in vacating its prior order. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Niehoff, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.