Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
MOREHOUSE et al. v. UNITED STATES et al., 1961 — 368 U.S. 348 · caselaw · US
General
MOREHOUSE et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
368 U.S. 348·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MOREHOUSE et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 500.
Decided December 18, 1961.
Clarence D. Todd, G. Duane Vieth and Robert N. Burchmore for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz Kahn for the United States et al.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.