Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Johnson et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 1956 — 352 U.S. 844 · caselaw · US
Constitutional Law · MBE-tested
Johnson et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission
352 U.S. 844·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Mr. Justice Black would grant certiorari in this case to consider whether executive officers can impose penalties of the nature here without denying the constitutional guaranties of “due process of law and trial by jury” upheld by this Court in Lipke v. Lederer, 259 U. S. 557, 562.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 174.
Johnson et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Thurman Arnold and Milton V. Freeman for petitioners. Simon E. Sobeloff, then Solicitor General, Thomas G. Meeker, Arden L. Andresen and Ellwood L. Englander for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Black would grant certiorari in this case to consider whether executive officers can impose penalties of the nature here without denying the constitutional guaranties of “due process of law and trial by jury” upheld by this Court in Lipke v. Lederer, 259 U. S. 557, 562.