Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH CO. v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO., 1929 — 32 F.2d 1021 · caselaw · US
General
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH CO. v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO.
32 F.2d 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH CO. v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO.
Circuit Court of Appeals. Sixth Circuit.
May 7, 1929.
No. 4834.
Humphrey, Crawford & Middleton, of Louisville, Ky., Walker D. Hines, Charles A. Marshall, John A. McQuillan, and Francis R. Stark, all of New York City, and Charles T. Cates, Jr., of Knoxville, Tenn., for appellant.
E. S. Jouett and J. H. McChord, both of Louisville, Ky., and J. B. Wright, of Knoxville, Tenn., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order dismissing appeal settled.