Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General Foods Corp. et al. v. State Wholesale Grocers et al., 1959 — 358 U.S. 947 · caselaw · US
Corporations
General Foods Corp. et al. v. State Wholesale Grocers et al.
358 U.S. 947·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 569.
General Foods Corp. et al. v. State Wholesale Grocers et al.
Edward R. Adams for the General Foods Corporation et al., and Lloyd M.'McBride and John P. Ryan, .. for the Morton Salt Co., petitioners. Robert Marks and William S. Kaplan for respondents. John T. Cahill, Lawrence J. McKay, Jerrold G. Van Cise and Thomas R. Mulroy filed a brief for the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., as amicus curiae, in support of the petition for writ of certiorari.
[MAJORITY]
The motion of the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, is granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.