General
A. P. OLZENDAM HOSIERY CO. v. LUCE et al.
125 F. 1000·United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·1903
Before COLT and PUTNAM, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
A. P. OLZENDAM HOSIERY CO. v. LUCE et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
October 23, 1903.)
No. 493.
George R. Nutter (J. Butler Studley and Brandies, Dunbar & Nutter, on the brief), for plaintiff in error. Charles E. Shattuck, for defendants in error.
Before COLT and PUTNAM, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Circuit Court is amended, so that it will show a dismissal for want of allegations of the citizenship of the defendants in that court, without costs, and, as thus amended, the judgment is affirmed. Neither party recovers costs in this court