Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In re Disbarment of Freel, 1972 — 404 U.S. 1056 · caselaw · US
General
In re Disbarment of Freel
404 U.S. 1056·Supreme Court of the United States·1972
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. A-521.
In re Disbarment of Freel.
[MAJORITY]
It having been reported to the Court that Frederick J. Freel, of Kansas City, Missouri, has been indefinitely suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Missouri, duly entered April 15, 1971, and this Court by order of November 22, 1971 [ante, p. 963], having suspended the said Frederick J. Freel from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;
And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent, and that a response has been filed;
It Is Ordered that the said Frederick J. Freel be, and he is hereby, disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.