Administrative
MULLER v. HAAS et al.
114 F. 1023·United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York·1902
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MULLER v. HAAS et al.
(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.
April 8, 1902.)
Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
Arthur v. Briesen, for the motion. Allan D. Kenyon, opposed.
[MAJORITY — LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.]
LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
Conceding that the additional prior patents introduced in evidence in this case make it necessary to restrict the patent closely to the details of cut shown in the specifications, nevertheless the first claim seems to he infringed. Whatever may be the patterns according to which defendants generally make riding habits, the particular habit produced here, when taken apart, shows so close a resemblance to the parts A and D of the patent as to warrant issue of preliminary injunction.