Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. N. Polkinhorn
15 Cust. Ct. 374·United States Customs Court·1945
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
United States v. N. Polkinhorn
No. 6187.
Invoice dated Mexicali, Mexico, March 18, 1943.
Certified March 18, 1943.
Entered at Calexico, Calif., March 18, 1943. .
Entry No. 1168-A.
(Decided June 26, 1945)
Paul P. Rao, Assistant Attorney General (Samuel D. Spector, special attorney), for the. plaintiff.
Harper &, Harper {Lawrence A. Harper of counsel) for the defendant.
[MAJORITY — Oliver, Presiding Judge:]
Oliver, Presiding Judge:
This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon an oral stipulation entered into by and between counsel for the parties hereto, agreeing, in substance, that the proper values for the merchandise under consideration should be as follows:
Per dozen
Item No. 5_¿_$3. 30
Item No. 6_4. 24
Item No. 7_'_5. 60
Net, packed. Including sales tax.
Accordingly, I hold the proper values for the involved merchandise to be as listed above.
Judgment will be rendered accordingly.