Contracts · MBE-tested
WARREN v. LARSON, STATE TREASURER
369 U.S. 427·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. · Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WARREN v. LARSON, STATE TREASURER.
No. 920,
Misc.
Decided April 16, 1962.
Walter Warren for appellant.
Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and Robert J. Kelly and Gerald Mager, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.