General
UNITED STATES v. McCAULLEY
68 F.2d 370·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES v. McCAULLEY.
No. 4960.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Jan. 6, 1934.
Paul F. Jones, U. S. Atty., of Danville, Ill. (Walter E. Ackermann, Asst. U. S. Atty., of East St. Louis, Ill., and Davis G. Arnold, and Wilbur C. Pickett, both of Washington, D. C., Attys., Veterans’ Administration, of counsel), for the United States.
Frank C. Wade, of . Terre Haute, Ind., for appellee.
Before EVANS, SPARKS, and FITZ HENRY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that the same was not taken within the time fixed by statute, having been presented after the ease was disposed of on the merits, it is ordered that the order heretofore entered reversing said decree is hereby vacated and set aside.
It is further ordered that the appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for want of jurisdiction.