Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
GARBER v. KANSAS, 1967 — 389 U.S. 51 · caselaw · US
General
GARBER v. KANSAS
389 U.S. 51·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GARBER v. KANSAS.
No. 393.
Decided October 23, 1967.
Marvin M. Karpatkin, E. Dexter Galloway and Melvin L. Wulf for appellant.
Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Leo Pfejjer for the National Committee for Amish Religious Freedom, as amicus curiae, in support of appellant.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam. The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Fortas]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Fortas
are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.